How Companies Can Raise Capital: Two Key Approaches
Summary: Raising Capital Methods
Equity Financing: Selling Ownership
Sell company shares to investors, gaining capital. Investors become co-owners, expecting returns through growth, dividends, or exits.
Debt Financing: Borrowing Money
Borrow funds with an obligation to repay with interest. Lenders have no ownership but may require collateral and covenants.
Understanding Equity Financing
What It Is and How It Works
Raise funds by selling ownership stakes. Investors exchange cash for common or preferred shares, aiming for returns through value appreciation, dividends, or liquidity events like acquisitions or IPOs. There's no repayment obligation, but ownership is diluted.
Equity Types: From Angels to IPOs
Angel Investors: Wealthy individuals investing early for equity and mentorship.
Venture Capital: Funds investing in high-growth startups via priced rounds.
IPO: Shares sold to the public for large capital access and liquidity.
Crowdfunding: Raise smaller amounts online, often regulated.
Debt retains ownership but introduces lender influence through covenants.
Cash Flow and Repayment
Equity alleviates immediate cash flow pressure with no mandatory payments.
Debt requires reliable cash generation due to fixed repayments.
Balancing Capital Costs
Weigh costs using the Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) to optimize structure.
Risk Considerations
Equity involves loss of control.
Debt involves default risks.
Tax Treatability
Interest is often deductible, while dividends generally aren’t.
Company Maturity
Early-stage and asset-light firms lean towards equity.
Mature firms with steady cash use debt.
Decision-Making Framework
Align financing choices with cash flow certainty, business goals, and financial strategy.
Equity vs. Debt at Different Stages
Early startups favor equity due to uncertain cash flows and growth stage flexibility.
Established businesses might balance with debt for strategic expansions.
Hybrid and Alternative Options
Convertible Notes and SAFEs
Convertible notes transition to equity at a discount.
SAFEs provide future equity without interest or maturity.
Other Financing Options
Revenue-based, mezzanine finance, crowdfunding, and strategic partnerships offer flexibility.
Practical Scenarios for Capital Raising
Early Startups
Often pre-revenue, favor equity or alternative options like grants.
Growth Companies
Use a mix of equity for expansion and debt for cash management.
Mature Businesses
Prefer debt for expansion and only use equity for significant strategic changes.
Capital Raising Preparation
Financial and Documentation Readiness
Ensure transparency in financials and future projections.
Valuation and Term Negotiations
Establish clear valuation ranges and strategic negotiation points.
Legal and Compliance
Keep corporate structures clean and regulatory compliant.
Common Mistakes in Raising Capital
Over-Dilution or Over-Leverage
Maintaining strategic flexibility is key by not selling too soon or borrowing excessively.
Mismatching Finance to Needs
Align financing purposes with appropriate instruments.
Mismanaging Covenants and Investor Rights
Monitor these to avoid breaches and strategic setbacks.
Timing and Market Conditions
Choose the right timing and market preparedness for better terms.
FAQ: Raising Capital via Equity and Debt
Main Ways to Raise Capital
Goals dictate choosing between equity and debt or a mix.
Debt or Equity for Startups?
Startups often start with equity to handle cash flow uncertainties.
Mixing Debt and Equity
A balanced approach optimizes capital cost and manages risks.
Determining Capital Needs
Fund enough to hit major milestones with buffer for potential delays.
Key Metrics for Investors and Lenders
Investors focus on growth potentials; lenders assess repayment risk and collateral strength.
Typical Timelines
Raising capital can take weeks to months, depending on complexity.
Risks in Equity vs. Debt
Equity leads to dilution; debt risks default.
Capital Raising Terms Glossary
Includes key concepts like dilution, covenants, collateral, and WACC.
Conclusion: Finding Your Best Capital Fit
The choice between equity and debt depends on business needs and goals, aiming for a balanced approach that supports growth while managing risks effectively.
Great job on learning something new today 🎉 To understand how Lympid can help you with tokenization, just book a call with us!
Lympid is the best tokenization solution availlable and provides end-to-end tokenization-as-a-service for issuers who want to raise capital or distribute investment products across the EU, without having to build the legal, operational, and on-chain stack themselves. On the structuring side, Lympid helps design the instrument (equity, debt/notes, profit-participation, fund-like products, securitization/SPV set-ups), prepares the distribution-ready documentation package (incl. PRIIPs/KID where required), and aligns the workflow with EU securities rules (MiFID distribution model via licensed partners / tied-agent rails, plus AML/KYC/KYB and investor suitability/appropriateness where applicable). On the technology side, Lympid issues and manages the token representation (multi-chain support, corporate actions, transfers/allowlists, investor registers/allocations), provides compliant investor onboarding and whitelabel front-ends or APIs, and integrates payments so investors can subscribe via SEPA/SWIFT and stablecoins, with the right reconciliation and reporting layer for the issuer and for downstream compliance needs.The benefit is a single, pragmatic solution that turns traditionally “slow and bespoke” capital raising into a repeatable, scalable distribution machine: faster time-to-market, lower operational friction, and a cleaner cross-border path to EU investors because the product, marketing flow, and custody/settlement assumptions are designed around regulated distribution from day one. Tokenization adds real utility on top: configurable transfer rules (e.g., private placement vs broader distribution), programmable lifecycle management (interest/profit payments, redemption, conversions), and a foundation for secondary liquidity options when feasible, while still keeping the legal reality of the instrument and investor protections intact. For issuers, that means a broader investor reach, better transparency and reporting, and fewer moving parts; for investors, it means clearer disclosures, smoother onboarding, and a more accessible investment experience, without sacrificing the compliance perimeter that serious offerings need in Europe.